<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>duhpookie &#187; environmental policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://duhpookie.com/blog/index.php/tag/environmental-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://duhpookie.com/blog</link>
	<description>think new thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 19:57:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Classic Liberalism: A Chance for Political Parties to Unite</title>
		<link>http://duhpookie.com/blog/2009/10/07/classical-liberalism-a-chance-for-political-parties-to-unite/</link>
		<comments>http://duhpookie.com/blog/2009/10/07/classical-liberalism-a-chance-for-political-parties-to-unite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bobbie Wood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Perfect World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banking crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial crisis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://duhpookie.com/blog/?p=396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the old days, say 1850 and before, the country operated fairly heavily in the realm of &#8220;Classic Liberalism.&#8221; Classic liberalism is defined roughly this way:
Freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and freedom of assembly were core commitments of classical liberalism, as was the underlying conception of the proper role of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://duhpookie.com/blog/2009/10/07/classical-liberalism-a-chance-for-political-parties-to-unite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oh, How We Need Bush to Leave Office</title>
		<link>http://duhpookie.com/blog/2008/04/23/oh-how-i-need-bush-to-leave-office/</link>
		<comments>http://duhpookie.com/blog/2008/04/23/oh-how-i-need-bush-to-leave-office/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bobbie Wood</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Perfect World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Serious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California emission standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://duhpookie.com/blog/2008/04/23/oh-how-i-need-bush-to-leave-office/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greenhouse, greenhouse, greenhouse. Gases, gases gases. The loveliness just keeps rolling in. I voted for Ah-nold. I am mostly a democrat, something of a libertarian, but I voted for Schwartzenegger and I&#8217;m proud because the man has held up his end of the deal, at least where it comes to environmental policy. The Bush administration, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://duhpookie.com/blog/2008/04/23/oh-how-i-need-bush-to-leave-office/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

